Judge Cratsley to Howie Carr: Why don't you report on the DOC/EOPSS CORI violations and Boston Herald, WDHD Defamation against Joanna Marinova?

Hahahaaaa... He didn't really say that, but he did slam the DOC for trying to shield hastily-departed Chief Harold Clarke, more on this momentarily.

Carr may be correct that he broke the story on the Probation Department, but under that same Department -- EOPSS -- Howie Carr hasn't said "Boo!" about the the corruption and CORI leaks at DOC and I know why:

It’s because his paper is the one getting jammed up, and Judge Cratsley’s Order of 22 November 2010 slamming the DOC/EOPSS attempt to shelter hastily-departed Chief Harold Clarke doesn’t really do Jessica Van Sack, the Herald -- or Sunbeam Management/WDHD - Channel 7 any favors, and here’s why:

Even though the DOC cannot restrict Defendant inquiry by subject matter (the Court did restrict the time to one hour), nothing he says will change what we already know as established in the movies linked below:

The DOC is far too tight-lipped to have actually told Jessica Van Sack or Byron Barnett that Joanna Marinova had sex with anybody, and the Darrell Jones disciplinary report (D-ticket) speaks for itself: Darrell Jones was cleared of any sexual misconduct and Ms. Marinova’s name doesn’t even appear on it. And I’ll have to check my files again but I believe the Herald knew that Plaintiff Marinova had signed in to visit Mr. Jones as she is supposed to do, and as she had done on prior occasion.

Therefore it is your employees, and you employees alone, who are responsible for the Defamatory accusations. See y'all at the next Court hearing, wouldn't miss it for the World. Meantime you newbies watch the movies.

And by-the-by, Harold Clarke's dossier is really horrible on open records and abuse, he ran from Washington before a pending vote of No Confidence. Governor Patrick twice publicly stated to me, at his Town Hall meeting and during an impromptu Juneteenth meeting that his administration was going to "conduct a thorough investigation"to "get to the bottom of this" (Town Hall) and that he would "put it to bed" (Juneteenth). So perhaps he did, maybe he made Clarke talk a hike, who knows. From Prison Legal News:

Heck, Howie and the Herald missed a Golden Opportunity to throw another racial slur, as they did when they celebrated the Departure of a Reformist DOC Chief John Boone, "Boone the Coon." I suggested they try "Clarke the Dark." And oh Howie, why did it take a part-time journalist like me to publish the emails from EOPSS management noting that there was at least one "crooked cop" involved.... and more..... "They [The Herald] are very nervous post Judge Earnest Murphy."

---

"The ticket didn't say anything about sexual acts. The officer wrote it was dismissed. This statement needs to be put out because no one is speaking out. The administration should have responded that these allegations are clearly not true.

What we have here is a crooked cop who is not only presenting a lie, but also snuck the information out of the institution which is violating CORI laws and CORI information. If the Herald did their research they would have seen that it was all dismissed. It was the Herald's and Jessica Van Sack's Responsibility as a reporter to look into all the facts. Jessica didn't. She ran the story. So either she got a forged report or she intentionally ran it."

Niggermania supports Tea Party U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte; Veterans support KingCast, Free Press.

KingCast says: Dear Council President Ross: History and fairness suggest that Chuck Turner be allowed to continue as Boston City Councilor.

Social_fairness_and_racial_equity_command_that_Boston_Councilor_Chuck_Turner_remain_in_office.

KingCast Suffok Superior updates on Joanna Marinova v. Boston Herald, WDHD/Channel 7 Defamation & CORI violations, Michael Picardi final pretrial tomo

Marinova_v._Boston_Herald_former_DOC_Supe_Clarke_fights_Depo_Suffolk_20010-CV-1316

Note: Be sure to watch the KingCast video at the bottom of the wepapers document. For the back story on this blatant CORI violation and Defamation case, read this post containing a damning email from an EOPSS , Mass Sex Offender Registry Board manager Charles E. McDonald, and read this summary post:

12 October 2010

Joanna Marinova v. Boston Herald et al. Defamation case updates: Jessica Van Sack and Byron Barnett are in Big Trouble.

Basically now it appears that the DOC has moved to delimit the upcoming Deposition Testimony of hastily-departed Harold Clarke, but they apparently screwed-up the Rule 9A Notice Requirement so the Court now has filings 27, 28, 29 on the Bench, I visited Judge Cransley’s chambers but he was on the bench and I couldn’t read the DOC’s EMERGENCY Motion, Plaintiff Marinova’s response or Sunbeam’s (Channel 7) Memorandum in Opposition. Whether the DOC gets the restriction originally requested in this document 26 shown here, they still have to deal with the common sense notion set forth by McDonald:

"The ticket didn't say anything about sexual acts. The officer wrote it was dismissed. This statement needs to be put out because no one is speaking out. The administration should have responded that these allegations are clearly not true.

What we have here is a crooked cop who is not only presenting a lie, but also snuck the information out of the institution which is violating CORI laws and CORI information. If the Herald did their research they would have seen that it was all dismissed. It was the Herald's and Jessica Van Sack's Responsibility as a reporter to look into all the facts. Jessica didn't. She ran the story. So either she got a forged report or she intentionally ran it."

****************

As to Michael Picardi, the mastermind who helped disassemble the gun that allegedly killed Revere Police Officer Dan Talbot, he's up on Accessory charges with regard to a knifing that Derek Lodie did to an unsuspecting mook immediately before the Dan Talbot shooting, under almost identical circumstances. Picardi and At bottom is a video with the same Judge Cransley giving Lodie an Easy Out on some other criminal charges, here is my journal entry on that piece. In tomorrow's case The Deal is that Lodie and Picardi cooked up a story to frame someone other than Lodie, the same way that some say they cooked up a story with respect to the Dan Talbot murder. Lodie got 8-12 on his Accessory charges, not concurrent as I understand, as I noted in this recent Jason Batman Watson journal entry about how this "altruistic" repeat criminal got an Easy Out from Federal District Judge Tauro on his pending weapons charges. Now Batman (who earned this name from his style of assaults) is up on a renewed Restraining Order held by the mother of his child, and is facing charges for attacking his current GF and playing stick-up games with a local Cabbie.

Remember: Officer Soto testified in video I probably have in my archives that the muzzle flash came from the guy in the red hoodie, and that would be Lodie, not Robert Iacoviello. Proffered testimony (watch it on KingCast video) from Michael Racca at trial supports that notion. It is possible, I asked in this journal entry, that DA Dan Conley and the Jury convicted the wrong guy?

It's nigh on impossible to keep track of this stuff, but somebody's gotta' do it.

KingCast slammed Senator Kelly Ayotte as NH AG with this NAACP Memorandum in Ayotte v. King, 2005-E-430, Judge Groff presiding.

Remember this post yesterday where I found the 6 Oct. 2006 Entry from Judge Groff denying Summary Judgment and finding that Senator-Elect Kelly Ayotte violated the Rules of Civil Procedure? Well the Court was being quite charitable to Kelly in not mentioning the fact that I had filed a rather damning NAACP First Amendment Legal Brief just prior to dismissal.

His Honor didn't mention the Memorandum in his Order denying Summary Judgment, but you had better believe if Kelly Ayotte thought she had the beans to get me for Unauthorized Practice of Law, she would have gone to trial. And I would have videotaped each and every agonizing moment of Kelly and Attorney Stratton getting their behinds handed to them by Yours Truly. Wherefore, she dismissed the "case" against me.

Along the way, however,I totally busted Senator-Elect Kelly Ayotte for an attempted ex post facto application of New Hampshire Law, specifically then HB 1768 vis a vis Chapter 311. In that post see also my proposed Stipulations, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I had to do all of that to kick her ass, just to be free from Unconstitutional encroachment from Kelly Ayotte and her crew of Open Government Free Press haters. Conduct like that from Kelly Ayotte against my lawful conduct as an NAACP Officer certainly gives rise to a claim that she is indeed, a bigot. Well, that plus her tacit acceptance of her support from Niggermania, watch the Official Kelly Ayotte Senate victory video.

KingCast timeout on Kelly Ayotte, GOP lawsuit, here come the DOC/EOPSS discovery documents sent to Boston Herald and WDHD attorneys proving Defamation

Remember how in the Kelly Ayotte lawsuit, KingCast v. Ayotte 2010-CV-501 I showed you in the "Dangerous Black Man Attacks Kelly Ayotte" video yesterday how things usually work when I approach high-powered political appointees like EOPSS Secretary Marybeth Heffernan?

Well as fate would have it, my public records request will be ready in about an hour, time to put down thee Amended Complaint in my case and grab a shower, fire up the 650R for a spirited ride downtown. I've already shown you in the video that DOC/EOPSS Public Affairs Director Diane Wiffin never told Jessica Van Sack or Byron Barnett that any sex was involved, so no need to go back over that now but get a load of this 3 June 2009 email from Charles E. McDonald, Mass Sex Offender Registry Board, also under EOPSS:

"The ticket didn't say anything about sexual acts. The officer wrote it was dismissed. This statement needs to be put out because no one is speaking out. The administration should have responded that these allegations are clearly not true.

What we have here is a crooked cop who is not only presenting a lie, but also snuck the information out of the institution which is violating CORI laws and CORI information. If the Herald did their research they would have seen that it was all dismissed. It was the Herald's and Jessica Van Sack's Responsibility as a reporter to look into all the facts. Jessica didn't. She ran the story. So either she got a forged report or she intentionally ran it."

---

Basically you can see that the Herald Reporter Jessica Van Sack was on a deadline, she made up a story about Plaintiff having sex with a prison reformer inmate named Darrell Jones (with CORI information illegally-obtained from someone at the DOC) and Channel 7's Byron Barnett followed suit and republished it. I helped Plaintiff Marinova curry support and representation from Todd and Weld, one of the strongest First Amendment firms in the Northeast. For the low-low on Joanna Marinova's case, and how corrupt the DOC is, read this post and this response to a DOC Internet plant.

Further, the Herald has had -- and continues to have -- issues with racism for quite some time, they called a former DOC Superintended "Boone the Coon" and read this case:

Gaines v. Boston Herald, 998 F. Supp 91 (1998).

Or how about "Fade to Blacko" remember that little gem?

F-Bomb to you guys, totally. F-Bomb you stinking maggots.