Sunday, November 28, 2010

Judge Cratsley to Howie Carr: Why don't you report on the DOC/EOPSS CORI violations and Boston Herald, WDHD Defamation against Joanna Marinova?

Hahahaaaa... He didn't really say that, but he did slam the DOC for trying to shield hastily-departed Chief Harold Clarke, more on this momentarily.


Carr may be correct that he broke the story on the Probation Department, but under that same Department -- EOPSS -- Howie Carr hasn't said "Boo!" about the the corruption and CORI leaks at DOC and I know why:

It’s because his paper is the one getting jammed up, and Judge Cratsley’s Order of 22 November 2010 slamming the DOC/EOPSS attempt to shelter hastily-departed Chief Harold Clarke doesn’t really do Jessica Van Sack, the Herald -- or Sunbeam Management/WDHD - Channel 7 any favors, and here’s why:


Even though the DOC cannot restrict Defendant inquiry by subject matter (the Court did restrict the time to one hour), nothing he says will change what we already know as established in the movies linked below:


The DOC is far too tight-lipped to have actually told Jessica Van Sack or Byron Barnett that Joanna Marinova had sex with anybody, and the Darrell Jones disciplinary report (D-ticket) speaks for itself: Darrell Jones was cleared of any sexual misconduct and Ms. Marinova’s name doesn’t even appear on it. And I’ll have to check my files again but I believe the Herald knew that Plaintiff Marinova had signed in to visit Mr. Jones as she is supposed to do, and as she had done on prior occasion.


Therefore it is your employees, and you employees alone, who are responsible for the Defamatory accusations. See y'all at the next Court hearing, wouldn't miss it for the World. Meantime you newbies watch the movies.


And by-the-by, Harold Clarke's dossier is really horrible on open records and abuse, he ran from Washington before a pending vote of No Confidence. Governor Patrick twice publicly stated to me, at his Town Hall meeting and during an impromptu Juneteenth meeting that his administration was going to "conduct a thorough investigation"to "get to the bottom of this" (Town Hall) and that he would "put it to bed" (Juneteenth). So perhaps he did, maybe he made Clarke talk a hike, who knows. From Prison Legal News:


Heck, Howie and the Herald missed a Golden Opportunity to throw another racial slur, as they did when they celebrated the Departure of a Reformist DOC Chief John Boone, "Boone the Coon." I suggested they try "Clarke the Dark." And oh Howie, why did it take a part-time journalist like me to publish the emails from EOPSS management noting that there was at least one "crooked cop" involved.... and more..... "They [The Herald] are very nervous post Judge Earnest Murphy."





"The ticket didn't say anything about sexual acts. The officer wrote it was dismissed. This statement needs to be put out because no one is speaking out. The administration should have responded that these allegations are clearly not true.
What we have here is a crooked cop who is not only presenting a lie, but also snuck the information out of the institution which is violating CORI laws and CORI information. If the Herald did their research they would have seen that it was all dismissed. It was the Herald's and Jessica Van Sack's Responsibility as a reporter to look into all the facts. Jessica didn't. She ran the story. So either she got a forged report or she intentionally ran it."

Monday, November 15, 2010

KingCast says: Dear Council President Ross: History and fairness suggest that Chuck Turner be allowed to continue as Boston City Councilor.


Social_fairness_and_racial_equity_command_that_Boston_Councilor_Chuck_Turner_remain_in_office.

KingCast Suffok Superior updates on Joanna Marinova v. Boston Herald, WDHD/Channel 7 Defamation & CORI violations, Michael Picardi final pretrial tomo

Marinova_v._Boston_Herald_former_DOC_Supe_Clarke_fights_Depo_Suffolk_20010-CV-1316

Note: Be sure to watch the KingCast video at the bottom of the wepapers document. For the back story on this blatant CORI violation and Defamation case, read this post containing a damning email from an EOPSS , Mass Sex Offender Registry Board manager Charles E. McDonald, and read this summary post:

12 October 2010

Joanna Marinova v. Boston Herald et al. Defamation case updates: Jessica Van Sack and Byron Barnett are in Big Trouble.

Basically now it appears that the DOC has moved to delimit the upcoming Deposition Testimony of hastily-departed Harold Clarke, but they apparently screwed-up the Rule 9A Notice Requirement so the Court now has filings 27, 28, 29 on the Bench, I visited Judge Cransley’s chambers but he was on the bench and I couldn’t read the DOC’s EMERGENCY Motion, Plaintiff Marinova’s response or Sunbeam’s (Channel 7) Memorandum in Opposition. Whether the DOC gets the restriction originally requested in this document 26 shown here, they still have to deal with the common sense notion set forth by McDonald:

"The ticket didn't say anything about sexual acts. The officer wrote it was dismissed. This statement needs to be put out because no one is speaking out. The administration should have responded that these allegations are clearly not true.

What we have here is a crooked cop who is not only presenting a lie, but also snuck the information out of the institution which is violating CORI laws and CORI information. If the Herald did their research they would have seen that it was all dismissed. It was the Herald's and Jessica Van Sack's Responsibility as a reporter to look into all the facts. Jessica didn't. She ran the story. So either she got a forged report or she intentionally ran it."

****************

As to Michael Picardi, the mastermind who helped disassemble the gun that allegedly killed Revere Police Officer Dan Talbot, he's up on Accessory charges with regard to a knifing that Derek Lodie did to an unsuspecting mook immediately before the Dan Talbot shooting, under almost identical circumstances. Picardi and At bottom is a video with the same Judge Cransley giving Lodie an Easy Out on some other criminal charges, here is my journal entry on that piece. In tomorrow's case The Deal is that Lodie and Picardi cooked up a story to frame someone other than Lodie, the same way that some say they cooked up a story with respect to the Dan Talbot murder. Lodie got 8-12 on his Accessory charges, not concurrent as I understand, as I noted in this recent Jason Batman Watson journal entry about how this "altruistic" repeat criminal got an Easy Out from Federal District Judge Tauro on his pending weapons charges. Now Batman (who earned this name from his style of assaults) is up on a renewed Restraining Order held by the mother of his child, and is facing charges for attacking his current GF and playing stick-up games with a local Cabbie.


Remember: Officer Soto testified in video I probably have in my archives that the muzzle flash came from the guy in the red hoodie, and that would be Lodie, not Robert Iacoviello. Proffered testimony (watch it on KingCast video) from Michael Racca at trial supports that notion. It is possible, I asked in this journal entry, that DA Dan Conley and the Jury convicted the wrong guy?


It's nigh on impossible to keep track of this stuff, but somebody's gotta' do it.


Tuesday, November 9, 2010

KingCast slammed Senator Kelly Ayotte as NH AG with this NAACP Memorandum in Ayotte v. King, 2005-E-430, Judge Groff presiding.

Remember this post yesterday where I found the 6 Oct. 2006 Entry from Judge Groff denying Summary Judgment and finding that Senator-Elect Kelly Ayotte violated the Rules of Civil Procedure? Well the Court was being quite charitable to Kelly in not mentioning the fact that I had filed a rather damning NAACP First Amendment Legal Brief just prior to dismissal.


His Honor didn't mention the Memorandum in his Order denying Summary Judgment, but you had better believe if Kelly Ayotte thought she had the beans to get me for Unauthorized Practice of Law, she would have gone to trial. And I would have videotaped each and every agonizing moment of Kelly and Attorney Stratton getting their behinds handed to them by Yours Truly. Wherefore, she dismissed the "case" against me.


Along the way, however,I totally busted Senator-Elect Kelly Ayotte for an attempted ex post facto application of New Hampshire Law, specifically then HB 1768 vis a vis Chapter 311. In that post see also my proposed Stipulations, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I had to do all of that to kick her ass, just to be free from Unconstitutional encroachment from Kelly Ayotte and her crew of Open Government Free Press haters. Conduct like that from Kelly Ayotte against my lawful conduct as an NAACP Officer certainly gives rise to a claim that she is indeed, a bigot. Well, that plus her tacit acceptance of her support from Niggermania, watch the Official Kelly Ayotte Senate victory video.

KingCast timeout on Kelly Ayotte, GOP lawsuit, here come the DOC/EOPSS discovery documents sent to Boston Herald and WDHD attorneys proving Defamation




Remember how in the Kelly Ayotte lawsuit, KingCast v. Ayotte 2010-CV-501 I showed you in the "Dangerous Black Man Attacks Kelly Ayotte" video yesterday how things usually work when I approach high-powered political appointees like EOPSS Secretary Marybeth Heffernan?


Well as fate would have it, my public records request will be ready in about an hour, time to put down thee Amended Complaint in my case and grab a shower, fire up the 650R for a spirited ride downtown. I've already shown you in the video that DOC/EOPSS Public Affairs Director Diane Wiffin never told Jessica Van Sack or Byron Barnett that any sex was involved, so no need to go back over that now but get a load of this 3 June 2009 email from Charles E. McDonald, Mass Sex Offender Registry Board, also under EOPSS:


"The ticket didn't say anything about sexual acts. The officer wrote it was dismissed. This statement needs to be put out because no one is speaking out. The administration should have responded that these allegations are clearly not true.

What we have here is a crooked cop who is not only presenting a lie, but also snuck the information out of the institution which is violating CORI laws and CORI information. If the Herald did their research they would have seen that it was all dismissed. It was the Herald's and Jessica Van Sack's Responsibility as a reporter to look into all the facts. Jessica didn't. She ran the story. So either she got a forged report or she intentionally ran it."


Basically you can see that the Herald Reporter Jessica Van Sack was on a deadline, she made up a story about Plaintiff having sex with a prison reformer inmate named Darrell Jones (with CORI information illegally-obtained from someone at the DOC) and Channel 7's Byron Barnett followed suit and republished it. I helped Plaintiff Marinova curry support and representation from Todd and Weld, one of the strongest First Amendment firms in the Northeast. For the low-low on Joanna Marinova's case, and how corrupt the DOC is, read
this post and this response to a DOC Internet plant.

Further, the Herald has had -- and continues to have -- issues with racism for quite some time, they called a former DOC Superintended "Boone the Coon" and read this case:

Gaines v. Boston Herald, 998 F. Supp 91 (1998).

Or how about "Fade to Blacko" remember that little gem?

F-Bomb to you guys, totally. F-Bomb you stinking maggots.


Saturday, October 30, 2010

Chuck Turner appeals to logic, common sense and social equity to request probation, delayed council vote to continue his community achievements.

"This is an attempt to destabilize a black and minority community that is on the move," bellowed Chuck Turner today from his podium in front of his Roxbury local office."


I wholly agree and wonder, as does Witness Wilburn, "where all the white people at?"


Good ol' Government, using $30K and folks involved with known cocaine dealers to go after the only Boston Council member to permanently staff a local office, nice. All of that is oh-so-important, but I still can't get a hearing on my Free Press Rights -- Fundamental Rights mind you -- in KingCast v. Kelly Ayotte, GOP and Nashua PD. Video, pictures and more later.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

A tea party group's endorsement of Kelly Ayotte is at odds with the moderate image the GOP sought for her.


I am now in touch with National Journal reporter Lindsey Boerma, who noted:

While the Washington GOP establishment is reportedly courting Ayotte as the “younger, dynamic female senator” emblematic of their new moderate fa├žade, she's apparently seeking the tea party's seal of approval.

"We only get into races when we are asked,” said FreedomWorks spokesman Adam Brandon, indicating that Ayotte sought out the group's support. Brandon said FreedomWorks made the endorsement only after gaining "consensus from our guys on the ground -- we can’t endorse if our activists’ membership is spilt."

I don't know if the Tea Party's official stance is to trounce any adverse media it can, perhaps Kelly is leading the way on that, read yesterday's post (with related video) on the GOP/Tea Party run-and-hide removal of my Civil Rights Free Press lawsuit and watch all Kelly Ayotte/GOP videos at YouTube KingCast65.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

KingCast opening Statement for Injunction hearing in KingCast v. Kelly Ayotte, GOP and Nashua Police.

Cross post: Firedoglake.


I stand in solidarity with my Alaskan brother Tony Hopfinger, whom I hope utters similar words in an open Courtroom sooner than later. I am filing tomorrow morning and unlike the Defendants, I have nothing -- absolutely nothing -- to hide, although I will not show my proposed ORDER until later tonight.


"Your Honor, First Amendment cases like this one come about once in a lifetime so we have to get it right.

And getting it right means acknowledging that the burden of persuasion in a Free Press/First Amendment case is on the State – not me. See generally Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 704, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).


I don’t have to recite all of the First Amendment accolades I have received over the years, some of which came from the former Mayor of this City in the form of a Mayoral Commendation…… and I don’t have to belabor the fact that I wrote for a daily and weekly newspaper and freelanced for several magazines…..


No, in point of fact I don’t have to do any of that because my any measure, I am a journalist and the White House and Governor Patrick’s staffers have long since realized this so I roll videos and take photographs right next to the Governor and from the press gallery with POTUS.


But the only stated rationales offered by Defendants, by and through Di Lothrop -- and I have it on video – is that I was ejected because “You are not a journalist,” and “This is a private event.”


As neither of those two assertions were correct, the Defendants can never meet their burden.

With that Your Honor I’m going to sit down to watch them try, and to answer any questions Your Honor may have....."



Kelly_Ayotte,_NH_GOP_sued_for_Free_Press_violations.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Boston Herald: Racist and built to stay that way.


First you had them calling former DOC Superintendent John Boone "Boone the Coon" in the 70's. Then in the 90's you have this:


"Under Massachusetts law, non-white job applicants were injured by employer's unlawful employment practice in using application form which requested applicants to list names of their friends and relatives at the predominately-white company, though non-white applicants were not given such application form and, thus, were not indirectly asked about their race, as those who received the application form at issue and listed names of friends and relatives, thereby indicating that they were white, were more likely to be hired. M.G.L.A. c. 151B, § 4, subd. 3."


Well at least Joanna Marinova is going to kick their butts in Marinova v. Boston Herald et al., watch the video.


Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Editor & Publisher to follow Marinova v. Herald et al Defamation and KingCast v. Kelly Ayotte & GOP Free Press cases.


Editor & Publisher is a fantastic resource. And with just a few quick keystrokes, they are now fully aware of the heinous nature of both of these cases.



I. Marinova v. Boston Herald et al., Suffolk Superior 2010-01316.

Defamation per se.


II. KingCast v. U.S. Senate Hopeful Kelly Ayotte, GOP (to be filed next week).

A. Mexican Standoff: The last of three (3) willful infractions and threats of arrest.

B. First Amendment Freedom of the Press explained to Kelly Ayotte, GOP.

C. Commentary from the prevailing party in a related 2009 NH High Court case.

D. The perspective video documenting prior successful First Amendment battles.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Joanna Marinova v. Boston Herald et al. Defamation case updates: Jessica Van Sack and Byron Barnett are in Big Trouble.




The back story part one and part two, along with KingCast audio from TOUCH 106.1 FM, with Plaintiff above. Part two is a direct response with three (3) different empirical DOC studies that I sent to an anonymous DOC poster who wrote in to the Boston Phoenix, ripped him but GOOD.


The bottom line is that Jessica Van Sack had direct knowledge before she wrote and published the story "Fox in the Hen House," that she was using illegally-obtained information. Why she did it, and why she thought she could get away with it is anyone's guess. That is why the Boston Herald Attorneys at Brown, Rudnick have embarked on a scorched-Earth policy in this litigation, going so far as to issue subpoenas to Plaintiff's mother, even though her Affidavit confirms that she had no knowledge of the events at hand.


The Parties have also filed three (3) subpoena duces tecum to DOC/EOPSS' Information Tzar Terrel Harris, which were denied pending further specificity by Suffolk Superior Judge John C. Cratsley. Plaintiff moved to take the Depositions


of EOPSS' Harris and Public Affairs Director Diane Wiffin and the Court granted this request but limited the scope of inquiry: The Parties may inquire as to what Mr. Harris or
Ms. Wiffin or allegedly told WHDH reporter Byron Barnett.

As you can see from the Pleadings in the body of this update, Reporter Barnett is hanging his hat on Diane Wiffin or somebody -- anybody at EOPS allegedly telling him the Ms. Marinova engaged in sexual acts, but the emails from Ms. Wiffin to tend to refute such assertion. I have posted on such email from Ms. Wiffin, written on 14 May 2009 -- before Defendants Herald and Van Sack published the Defamatory allegations that Ms. Marinova had sex with an inmate(s) and that she was not permitted to be a visitor. She was fully permitted to be a visitor regardless of State Representative Fox’s capacity as an investigator.


"Hi Jessica! In addition to CORI (MGL Chapter 6, Section 167-168 is the CORI statute that prohibits the DOC from disseminating information on anything pertaining to an inmates incarceration with the DOC), an immate move is a departmental security issue and we would not talk about it..... Diane."

Now exactly how what part of CORI privacy Reporter Van Sack failed to comprehend, I can't say. I have more from Ms. Wiffin to Defendant Van Sack, wait for the movie tonight.


The Defendants moved to Depose Superintendent Gary Roden, Sergeant David Malone, David Hockey, Co Janet Correia, CO JoEllen Gardner, Superintendent Stephen O'Brien, DOS Nelson Julius, CO Graham Trout and the hastily-departed DOC Director Harold Clarke. DOC/EOPSS filed timely Motions for Protective Orders. In its ORDER of 5 October 2010 the Court ruled as follows:


1. Gary Roden -- Protective Order granted.

2. David Malone and all CO's -- Protective Order denied, Deposition inquiry limited to the events of 28 & 29 Nov. 2008, and 7 May 2009, and the Darrell Jones disciplinary report and hearing noting the dismissal of any inappropriate sexual contact charges.

3. Harold Clarke -- Denied, Deposition to occur before 31 Dec. 2010.

4. Mary Beth Heffernan -- Protective Order granted.


Darrell Jones' Deposition will be scheduled prior to year's end as well, and it should be fascinating. The Defendants and the DOC are about to publicly get their eyes opened to something that they might wish they never inquired about in the first place. I believe that Deposition my friends, is a public record and I will be posting it in its entirety. Well even if it isn't public record, Mr. Jones will give me first dibs and send me a copy anyway, so there you have it.